Code of Conduct

This  Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel (the ‘Code of Conduct’) is adopted and implemented as part of ESIC’s continuing efforts to maintain the public image, popularity and integrity of Esport by providing an effective means to deter any Participant from conducting themselves improperly whilst participating in Esports or acting in any way as an ambassador for or representative of an ESIC Member.

1.1 All Participants are automatically bound by and required to comply with all of the provisions of the Code of Conduct. Participants shall be deemed to have agreed:

1.1.1 that it is their personal responsibility to familiarise themselves with all of the requirements of the Code of Conduct, including what conduct constitutes an offence under the Code of Conduct;

1.1.2 to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of any Match Referee, the Integrity Commissioner, Disciplinary Panel or Appeal Panel convened under the Disciplinary Procedure to hear and determine charges brought (and any appeals in relation thereto) pursuant to the Code of Conduct; and

1.1.3 not to bring any proceedings in any court or other forum that are inconsistent with the foregoing submission to the jurisdiction of the Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner, Disciplinary Panel or Appeal Panel.

1.2 All Participants shall continue to be bound by and required to comply with the Code of Conduct until he/she has not participated in a Match or been involved in any Event for a period of twelve (12) months and ESIC shall continue to have jurisdiction over him/her under the Code of Conduct thereafter in respect of matters taking place prior to that point.

1.3 Without prejudice to Articles 1.1 and 1.2, ESIC and the Members shall be responsible for promoting Code of Conduct awareness and education amongst Participants; in particular Players and Player Support Personnel.

1.4 It is acknowledged that certain Participants may also be subject to other rules of Members that govern discipline and/or conduct, and that the same conduct of such Participants may implicate not only the Code of Conduct but also such other rules that may apply. For the avoidance of any doubt, Participants acknowledge and agree that: (a) the Code of Conduct is not intended to limit the responsibilities of any Participant under such other rules; and (b) nothing in such other rules shall be capable of removing, superseding or amending in any way the jurisdiction of the Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner, Disciplinary Panel or Appeal Panel to determine matters properly arising pursuant to the Code of Conduct.

The conduct described in Articles 2.1 – 2.5, if committed by a Participant shall amount to an offence by such Participant under the Code of Conduct.

Comment: Where considered helpful, guidance notes have been provided in text boxes beneath the description of a particular offence. Such notes are intended only to provide guidance as to the nature and examples of certain conduct that might be prohibited by a particular Article and should not be read as an exhaustive or limiting list of conduct prohibited by such Article.

2.1 Level 1 Offences:

2.1.1 Abuse or changing (without approval) of gaming equipment/hardware or facilities provided for a Match or Event by a Member, Event, Tournament Host, Tournament Organizer, or Tournament Sponsor. For the avoidance of any doubt, there shall be no requirement that the Match Referee must first provide a warning to the offending person before a breach of this Article can be established.

Note: Article 2.1.1 includes any action(s) outside the course of Game play actions, such as deliberately breaking, attempting to break, hitting or kicking equipment, furnishings, facilities, advertising boards or other fixtures.

2.1.2 Disobeying or showing noticeable or disruptive dissent at the reasonable instructions or requests of Match Referees or other Official/s responsible for the smooth running and administration of Events by a Member, Event, Tournament Host, Tournament Organizer, or Tournament Sponsor.

2.1.3 Using language or a gesture that is obscene, offensive, or insulting during a Match or Event by a Member, Event, Tournament Host, Tournament Organizer, or Tournament Sponsor.

Note: Article 2.1.3 includes: (a) excessively audible or repetitious swearing; and (b) obscene gestures which are not directed at another person, such as swearing in frustration at one’s own poor play or fortune. For clarity, this offence is not intended to penalise trivial behaviour. When assessing the seriousness of the breach, the Match Referee shall be required to take into account the context of the particular situation and whether the words or gesture are likely to: (a) be regarded as obscene; (b) give significant offence; or (c) insult another person. This offence is not intended to cover any use of language or gestures that are likely to offend another person on the basis of their race, religion, gender, colour, descent, national or ethnic origin. Such conduct is prohibited and comes under more serious levels of offence later in this Code.

2.1.4 Derogatory or negative statements about, public criticism of, or inappropriate public comments in relation to an incident occurring in a Match or any Player participating in any Match, or Player Support Personnel, Official, Team, Event, Tournament Host, Tournament Organizer, or Tournament Sponsor irrespective of when such criticism or inappropriate comment is made.

2.1.5 Where the facts of the alleged incident are not adequately or clearly covered by any of the above offences, conduct that brings Esports, the Game, Event, ESIC, Member, Event, Tournament Host, Tournament Organizer, or Tournament Sponsor into disrepute.

2.2 Level 2 Offences:

2.2.1 Showing serious dissent at a Match Referee’s or the Integrity Commissioner’s (or his delegate’s) decision during a Match or Event.

2.2.2 Breach of Event clothing, equipment, commercial or media obligations during a Match or Event.

2.2.3 Derogatory or negative statements about, serious public criticism of, or inappropriate comment in relation to, an incident occurring in a Match or Event or any Player, participating in a Match or any Player Support Personnel, Official, Team, Event, Tournament Host, Tournament Organizer, or Tournament Sponsors, irrespective of when such criticism or inappropriate comment is made.

2.2.4 Inappropriate and deliberate physical contact between Players and/or Player Support Personnel and/or Officials during a Match or Event.

2.2.5 Behaving in a threatening manner or advancing towards another Participant or Official in an aggressive manner during a Match or Event.

2.2.6 Deliberate and malicious distraction or obstruction of another Participant during a Match.

2.2.7 Using language or gesture(s) that is seriously obscene, seriously offensive or of a seriously insulting nature to another Player, Player Support Personnel, Official or any other third person during a Match or Event.

Note: It is acknowledged that there will be verbal exchanges between Participants in the course of an Event. Rather than seeking to eliminate these exchanges entirely, Match Referees are required to deal with or report such conduct that falls below an acceptable standard. This offence is not intended to penalise trivial behaviour. When assessing the seriousness of the breach, the Match Referee or relevant official shall be required to take into account the context of the particular situation and whether the words or gesture are likely to: (a) be regarded as seriously obscene; or (b) give serious offence; or (c) seriously insult another person. This offence is not intended to cover any use of language or gestures that are likely to offend another person on the basis of their race, religion, gender, colour, descent, national or ethnic origin. Such conduct is prohibited and must be dealt with as a more serious level of offence in this Code.

2.2.8 Any attempt to manipulate a Match for inappropriate strategic or tactical reasons.

Note: Article 2.2.8 is intended to prevent the manipulation of Matches or Games for inappropriate strategic or tactical reasons (such as when a Player or Team deliberately loses a pool Match in an Event in order to affect the standings of other Players or Teams in that Event).Article 2.2.8 is not intended to cover any corrupt or fraudulent acts (including any use of inside information and/or related betting activity). Such conduct is prohibited under the Anti-Corruption Code and must be dealt with accordingly. The Team captain and/or manager of any Team guilty of such conduct shall be held primarily responsible (and subject to sanction) for any offence found to have been committed under this Article, but other Players in any Team may also receive sanctions under this Article.

2.2.9 Where the facts of the alleged incident are not adequately or clearly covered by any of the above offences, conduct that brings Esport, the Game, Event, ESIC or a Member into disrepute.

2.3 Level 3 Offences:

2.3.1 Intimidation of any Participant whether by language or conduct (including gestures).

2.3.2 Threat of assault on another Participant or any other person (including a spectator) during a Match or Event.

2.3.3 Cheating or attempting to cheat to win a Game or Match.

Note: Cheating to win is either a level 3 (as in this Article) or level 4 offence depending on the nature and seriousness of the cheating (in the entire discretion of the Match Referee, the Integrity Commissioner or their delegates). Without limitation, cheating can include:
“Map Hack” (using external software to gain more vision than intended by the game mechanics)
“Aim Bot” (using external software to automatically hit opponents when firing a weapon)
“Ghosting” (getting additional information about the game, usually the opponent, from third party sources like stream viewers or the live audience)
Any external software that directly tampers with the game software to gain any kind of advantage in the game.
Article 2.3.3 is not intended to cover any corrupt or fraudulent acts related to betting activity. Such conduct is prohibited under the Anti-Corruption Code and must be dealt with accordingly. The Team captain and/or manager of any Team guilty of such conduct shall be held primarily responsible (and subject to sanction) for any offence found to have been committed under this Article, but other Players in any Team may also receive sanctions under this Article.

2.3.4 Where the facts of the alleged incident are not adequately or clearly covered by any of the above offences, conduct that brings Esport, the Game, Event, ESIC or a Member into disrepute.

2.3.5 Participants shall not misappropriate the assets of the Event, Tournament organiser, the team, or any sponsors, affiliates, other Participants, or viewers and attendees of the Event, whether directly or indirectly through or in conjunction with intermediaries or other third parties.

Note: Article 2.3.5 includes any action(s) that involve the unauthorized use, theft, or misallocation of resources, funds, or property belonging to the aforementioned entities.

2.3.6 Participants shall not obtain or attempt to obtain benefits for themselves or third parties through the misappropriation of assets or any other fraudulent means.

Note: Article 2.3.6 is intended to cover any conduct that seeks to gain advantage or benefits indirectly by using intermediaries or other third parties to misappropriate assets or engage in fraudulent activities.

2.3.7. Violation of any applicable law or regulation in the country in which the tournament is hosted, including laws relating to conduct in public places and criminal law.

2.3.8. Making, directly or indirectly, derogatory, discriminatory, critical or other statements or taking any action which is directed to or in reference to an individual, organization, country or group of people and which relates to appearance, ethnic, national or social origin, gender, language, religion, political opinion, wealth, birth, sexual orientation or a similar circumstance.

2.3.9. Offend the dignity or integrity of a country, individual or group of persons by contemptuous, discriminatory, or denigrating words or  actions, on account of appearance, ethnic, national or social origin, gender, language, religion, political or any other opinion, wealth, birth or any other status, sexual orientation or any other reason.

2.4 Level 4 Offences:

2.4.1 Threat of assault on a Participant during a Match or Event.

2.4.2 Physical assault of another Participant any other person (including a spectator) during a Match or Event.

2.4.3 Any act of violence in the Match or Event environment (including any hotel or other accommodation where more than one Player or Team is staying during or immediately either side of an Event).

2.4.4 Cheating or attempting to cheat to win a Game or Match.

2.4.5 Where the facts of the alleged incident are not adequately or clearly covered by any of the above offences, conduct that brings Esport, the Game, Event, ESIC or a Member into disrepute.

Note: Cheating to win is either a level 3 or level 4 (as in this Article) offence depending on the nature and seriousness of the cheating (in the entire discretion of the Match Referee, the Integrity Commissioner or their delegates). Without limitation, cheating can include:
“Map Hack” (using external software to gain more vision than intended by the game mechanics)
“Aim Bot” (using external software to automatically hit opponents when firing a weapon)
“Ghosting” (getting additional information about the game, usually the opponent, from third party sources like stream viewers or the live audience)
Any external software that directly tampers with the game software to gain any kind of advantage in the game.

2.4.6 Participants shall refrain from any activity or behavior that might give rise to the appearance or suspicion of improper conduct.

2.5 General Conduct:

2.5.1. Acting in a way that is not honest and respectful and/or without integrity, and/or does not respect the principle of fair play at an Event at all times.

2.5.2 Giving or providing to any Participant, Event/Tournament Host, Tournament Organizer, or Tournament Sponsor any gift, payment, hospitality, or other benefit (whether of a monetary value or otherwise) either (a) for the purpose of procuring (directly or indirectly) any Corrupt Conduct, or (b) in circumstances that could bring the Participant, Esport, the Game, Event, ESIC, Event/Tournament Host, Tournament Organizer, or Tournament Sponsor into disrepute.

2.5.3 Failing to disclose to ESIC (without unnecessary delay) (a) any Corrupt Conduct, or (b) any conduct that could bring the Participant, Esport, the Game, Event, ESIC, Event/Tournament Host, Tournament Organizer, or Tournament Sponsor into disrepute.

2.5.4 Failing to disclose to ESIC (without unnecessary delay) all gifts (whether monetary or otherwise), hospitality, and/or other non-contractual benefits offered to a Participant that have a value of US$500.00 or more, whether or not the circumstances set out in Article 2.5.2 are present, save that there shall be no obligation to disclose any (i) personal gifts, hospitality, and/or other non-contractual benefits offered by or on behalf of any relative of the Participant, (ii) any food or beverage gifts, or (iii) Event hospitality gifts in connection with Matches/Events the Participant is participating in.

Note: For the purposes of any disclosures made pursuant to either Article 2.5.2 or 2.5.3, such disclosures must be made to ESIC, which shall keep a register of all such disclosures, and will share, subject to the Integrity Commissioner’s entire discretion and where deemed necessary, the content of such register (or any part of it) with the relevant ESIC Member, being, potentially, the Game publisher, Match or Event organiser or promoter.

2.5.4 Failing to disclose to ESIC (without unnecessary delay) full details of any approaches or invitations received by the Participant to engage in Corrupt Conduct.

2.5.5 Failing to disclose to ESIC (without unnecessary delay) full details of any incident, fact, or matter that comes to the attention of a Participant that may evidence Corrupt Conduct by another Participant, including (without limitation) approaches or invitations that have been received by another Participant to engage in Corrupt Conduct.

2.5.6 Participants shall refrain from any activity or behavior that might give rise to the appearance or suspicion of improper conduct.

2.A.1. Where ESIC receives, observes or otherwise discovers information that displays, on the balance of probabilities, that an individual or group of individuals have acted or planned to act in a way which would contravene ESIC’s Code of Conduct, ESIC may issue a ‘Rejection Order’ to its membership.

2.A.2. A Rejection Order must essentially contain:

1. An outline of the behaviour that is in alleged breach of the Code of Conduct;
2. An outline of the information received and assessed by ESIC as evidence of the conclusion;
3. A disclosure of the Rejected Participants relevant to the Rejection Order;
4. A start date for the enforcement of the Rejection Order;
5. An end date for the cessation of the Rejection Order; and
6. Any other information that the Commissioner considers to be necessary or relevant to the Rejection Order.

2.A.3. In setting the start and end dates relevant to a Rejection Order, the Commissioner must consider the ordinary sanctioning principles disclosed in the Code of Conduct in a manner consistent with sanctioning action undertaken by ESIC relating to member events.

2.A.4. In a situation where an ESIC Member wishes to permit entry of a Rejected Participant into a tournament, it must notify ESIC of this permission and the reasons for it in writing within 5 business days of making such a concession.

2.A.5. In facilitating a Rejection Order, ESIC must make a reasonable endeavour to inform the Rejected Participant of the existence of the Rejection Order.

2.A.6. In a circumstance where a Rejected Participant wishes to contest the Rejection Order, they may write to the Commissioner at commissioner@esic.gg.

2.B Publisher Sanctions and Use of Publisher IP
2.B.1 Where ESIC becomes aware that a Game publisher (Publisher) has imposed any ban, suspension, restriction, disqualification or other disciplinary measure (a Publisher Sanction) on a Participant in relation to the use of that Publisher’s Game or participation in that Publisher’s esports ecosystem, ESIC may, in its discretion, recognise and give effect to that Publisher Sanction by imposing an equivalent or otherwise appropriate sanction under this Code of Conduct in respect of any Match or Event conducted by a Member.

2.B.2 Without prejudice to Articles 2.5.1 and 2.A, a Participant commits an offence under this Code of Conduct where he/she:

2.B.2.1 participates or attempts to participate in any Match or Event conducted by a Member utilising a Publisher’s Game or other Publisher intellectual property (Publisher IP) while subject to a Publisher Sanction that prohibits such participation; or

2.B.2.2 engages in conduct that is intended to, or has the effect of, circumventing or undermining the application of a Publisher Sanction in any Match or Event conducted by a Member.

2.B.3 In exercising its discretion under Article 2.B.1, ESIC may treat any final decision, sanction or other disciplinary determination of a Publisher (including any written decision and/or public announcement of that decision) as sufficient evidence that an offence under this Article 2.B has occurred, unless the Participant establishes that the Publisher’s process materially violated principles of natural justice or that the Publisher Sanction is the subject of a pending appeal with suspensive effect.

2.B.4 ESIC may, where appropriate, issue a Rejection Order pursuant to Article 2.A in respect of any Participant who is subject to a Publisher Sanction recognised under this Article 2.B, and may align the start and end dates of such Rejection Order with the relevant Publisher Sanction or such other period as is consistent with the ordinary sanctioning principles disclosed in this Code of Conduct.

Note: For the avoidance of doubt, ESIC considers it inconsistent with the principles of integrity, fair play and respect for Publisher IP for a Participant to utilise a Publisher’s Game or other Publisher IP in a Match or Event conducted by a Member where that Participant has been banned, suspended or otherwise made ineligible by that Publisher from participating in that Game or esports ecosystem. This Article 2.B is intended to ensure that ESIC and its Members do not provide an alternative forum for Participants to evade or undermine Publisher-imposed sanctions, and to promote consistent application of disciplinary outcomes across the wider Esport ecosystem.

Note: Where a Code of Conduct offence is alleged to have occurred during, or in relation to an Event, the Code of Conduct shall apply in full, but with a series of amendments to the reporting process (Article 3), Disciplinary Procedure and appeal process (Contained in the Disciplinary Procedure) in order to ensure that any matters arising can be dealt with expediently and with minimum disruption to the Event.

3.1 Any one of the following individuals can report an alleged offence under the Code of Conduct by lodging a report in the manner described in Article 3.2, below (a ‘Report’):

3.1.1 a Match Referee that officiated in the Match or Event during which the alleged offence was committed;

3.1.2 the team captain, manager or CEO of either of the two Teams participated in the Match during, or in relation to which, the alleged offence was committed;

3.1.3 the authorised ESIC representative of the Member in or during who’s Game, Match or Event the alleged offence took place.

3.1.3 the Integrity Commissioner.

3.2 All Reports must be completed in writing (including email) clearly designated “Report under the Code of Conduct” and set out as much detail as possible about the alleged offence and sent to the person designated to receive reports in Article 3.2.1 below. The reporter must ensure it is clear by whom the Report is being or has been made. Reports made under Articles 3.2.1.1 and 3.2.1.2 can initially be made verbally or by instant messenger or in-game communications, but a summary in writing must be sent to the Integrity Commissioner within 24 hours of the verbal Report by the person to whom the verbal Report is made (usually the Match Referee).

3.2.1 Where the Report is lodged by any of the individuals authorised under Article 3.1 in relation to:

3.2.1.1 a Level 1 or Level 2 Offence that is alleged to have been committed during a Match or Event, then the Report must be lodged without delay with the Match Referee (except in exceptional circumstances, at least prior to the start of the next Match involving the Player or Team against whom the Report is being made); or

3.2.1.2 a Level 1 or Level 2 Offence that is alleged to have been committed at any time or place other than during a Match or Event must be lodged with the Match Referee (or, where, for logistical reasons, it is impractical to lodge with the Match Referee, the Integrity Commissioner) as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event, no later than forty-eight (48) hours after: (a) the commission of the alleged offence; or (b) the alleged offence was brought to the attention of the person lodging the Report; or

3.2.1.3 a Level 3 or Level 4 Offence that is alleged to have been committed, then the Report must be lodged with the Integrity Commissioner as soon as reasonable, and if practicable, no later than three (3) days after either: (a) the commission of the alleged offence; or (b) the alleged offence was brought to the attention of the person lodging the Report.

3.3 Where it is alleged that a Participant has committed more than one offence under the Code of Conduct, then a separate Report should be filed in accordance with this Article 3 for each of the offences that are alleged to have been committed, unless, in the entire discretion of the person making the Report, the alleged offences occurred during the same incident or arose out of the same set of circumstances, in which case, the allegations can be made in one report.

4.1 Where a Match Referee makes or receives a Report, he/she must promptly provide a copy of the Report, together with a Notice of Charge (where he/she determines in their absolute discretion that there is a case to answer) to the following individuals:

4.1.1 the Participant/s named in the Report, or, where appropriate, the relevant Team Captain; and

4.1.2 the Team Manager (if there is one) of any relevant Participant named in the Report.

4.2 The Notice of Charge shall specify that the Participant shall have the following three options:

4.2.1 he/she may admit the offence charged and accede to the suggested sanction specified in the Notice of Charge (which sanction shall be strictly at the Match Referee’s discretion, but at all times within the appropriate range for the level of Offence by reference to the Disciplinary Procedure). In such circumstances, and provided that such admission has been received by the Match Referee prior to the commencement of any hearing offered in the Notice of Charge, the hearing before the Match Referee shall not be required and no further action shall be taken, save that ESIC shall promptly issue a public statement confirming: (a) the commission of an offence under the Code of Conduct; and (b) the imposition of the applicable sanction specified in the Notice of Charge as accepted by the Participant; or

4.2.2 he/she may admit the offence charged but dispute the suggested sanction specified in the Notice of Charge, in which case the matter shall proceed to a hearing in accordance with the Disciplinary Procedure; or

4.2.3 he/she may deny the offence charged, in which case the matter shall proceed to a hearing in accordance with the Disciplinary Procedure.

4.3 Where the Integrity Commissioner receives a Report, he/she must promptly conduct a review to determine whether the Participant named in the Report has a case to answer.

4.4 If the initial review of the Report reveals that there is no case to answer, then the Integrity Commissioner shall notify the person who filed the Report of that fact, and the matter shall not proceed any further.

4.5 If the initial review of the Report reveals that there is a case to answer, then the Integrity Commissioner shall promptly provide a copy of the Report, together with a Notice of Charge to the following individuals:

4.5.1 the Participant named in the Report; and

4.5.2 the Team Manager (if there is one) of any Participant named in the Report; and

4.5.3 the CEO/s (or his/her designate/s) of the Member/s during whose Game and/or Event  the alleged offence took place.

4.6 The Notice of Charge shall specify that the Participant shall have the following options:

4.6.1 he/she may admit the offence charged and accede to the suggested sanction specified in the Notice of Charge (which sanction shall be strictly at the Integrity Commissioner’s discretion, but at all times within the appropriate range for the level of offence as set out in the Disciplinary Procedure). In such circumstances, and provided that such admission has been received by the Integrity Commissioner prior to the commencement of the hearing at the time/place specified in the Notice of Charge, the hearing shall not be required and no further action shall be taken, save that ESIC shall promptly issue a public statement confirming: (a) the commission of an offence under the Code of Conduct; and (b) the imposition of the applicable sanction specified in the Notice of Charge; or

4.6.2 he/she may admit the offence charged but dispute the suggested sanction specified in the Notice of Charge, in which case the matter shall proceed to a hearing in accordance with the Disciplinary Procedure; or

4.6.3 he/she may deny the offence charged, in which case the matter shall proceed to a hearing in accordance with the Disciplinary Procedure.

The procedure to be used to deal with allegations of offences under this Code of Conduct is the ESIC Disciplinary Procedure.

6.1 Unless otherwise described herein, the standard of proof in all cases brought under the Code of Conduct shall be whether the Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner or Disciplinary Panel (as appropriate) is comfortably satisfied, bearing in mind the seriousness of the allegation that is made, that the alleged offence has been committed. This standard of proof in all cases shall be the balance of probabilities.

6.2 The Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner or Disciplinary Panel shall not be bound by judicial rules governing the admissibility of evidence. Instead, facts relating to an offence committed under the Code of Conduct may be established by any reliable means, including admissions.

6.3 The Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner or Disciplinary Panel may draw an inference adverse to the Participant who is asserted to have committed an offence under the Code of Conduct based on his/her refusal, without compelling justification, after a request made in a reasonable time in advance of the hearing, to appear at the hearing (either in person or telephonically as directed by the Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner or Disciplinary Panel) and/or to answer any relevant questions.

6.4 Investigative Powers and Procedures

6.4.1 Any allegation or suspicion of a breach of the Code of Conduct, whatever the source, shall be referred to the Integrity Commissioner for investigation.

6.4.2 ESIC and its officers may at any time conduct an investigation into the activities of any Participant that they believe may have committed an offence under the Anti-Corruption Code or the Code of Conduct. Such investigations may be conducted in conjunction with, and/or information obtained in such investigations may be shared with, Members and/or other relevant authorities (including criminal, administrative, professional and/or judicial authorities). All Participants and Members must cooperate fully with such investigations, failing which any such Participant shall be liable to be charged with a breach of the Anti-Corruption Code or the Code of Conduct pursuant to Articles 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.5.3, 2.5.4 and/or 2.5.5 (and it shall not be a valid basis for failing or refusing to cooperate or a valid defence to any such subsequent charge for a Participant to invoke any privilege against self-incrimination, which privilege is deemed to have been waived by the Participant). ESIC shall have discretion, where it deems appropriate, to stay its own investigation pending the outcome of investigations being conducted by other relevant authorities.

6.4.3 As part of any investigation, ESIC or its officers may at any time (including after a Notice of Charge has been provided to a relevant Participant) make a written demand to any Participant (a “Demand”) to provide to ESIC, in writing, by answering interrogatories, and/or by answering questions in person at an interview (as ESIC or its officers elect), with any information that ESIC or its officers reasonably believe may be relevant to the investigation, including (without limitation) (a) copies or access to all relevant records (such as current or historic telephone records, bank statements, Internet services records and/or other records stored on computer hard drives or other information storage equipment or any consent forms related thereto); and/or (b) all of the facts and circumstances of which the Participant is aware with respect to the matter being investigated. In the event of an Interview, ESIC reserves the right to have the interview recorded at its sole discretion. Any such Demand that has been issued in accordance with this Article, and subject to any applicable principles of national law, the Participant shall cooperate fully with such Demand, including by furnishing such information within such reasonable period of time as may be determined by ESIC or its officers. Where appropriate, the Participant may seek an extension of such deadline by providing ESIC or its officers with cogent reasons to support an extension, provided that the decision to grant or deny such extension shall be in the discretion of ESIC or its officers, acting reasonably at all times.

6.4.4 Any information furnished to ESIC or its officers (whether pursuant to a specific Demand or otherwise as part of an investigation) will not be used for any purpose other than in accordance with the Anti-Corruption Code and the Code of Conduct and will be kept strictly confidential except when:

6.4.4.1 it becomes necessary to disclose such information in support of a charge of breach of the Anti-Corruption Code or the Code of Conduct;

6.4.4.2 such information is required to be disclosed by any applicable law;

6.4.4.3 such information is already published or a matter of public record, readily acquired by an interested member of the public, or disclosed according to the rules and regulations governing the relevant Match; and/or

6.4.4.4 it becomes necessary (because the information gathered may also amount to or evidence infringements of other applicable laws or regulations) to disclose such information to other competent authorities (including any applicable police, taxation, fraud, criminal intelligence or other authorities), whether pursuant to formal information-sharing agreements or otherwise.

6.4.5 All Participants must cooperate with ESIC or its officers in relation to any proceedings brought against any other Participant for Corrupt Conduct in breach of the Anti-Corruption Code or the Code of Conduct, including (without limitation) through the provision of a witness statement(s) in respect of information in the possession of the Participant and/or attending, for the purposes of providing truthful oral evidence, any disciplinary hearing convened before an Anti-Corruption Tribunal under the Anti-Corruption Code or the Code of Conduct, where requested by ESIC, failing which the non-cooperating Participant shall be liable to be charged with a breach of the Anti-Corruption Code or the Code of Conduct. It shall not be a valid basis for failing or refusing to cooperate or a valid defence to any such subsequent charge for a Participant to invoke any privilege against self-incrimination.

6.4.6 If, at any time, ESIC or its officers determine that there is an offence under Article 2, then the Participant shall be sent written notice of the following (the “Notice of Charge”):

6.4.6.1 that the Participant has a case to answer under Article 2;

6.4.6.2 the specific offence(s) that the Participant is alleged to have committed;

6.4.6.3 details of the alleged acts and/or omissions relied upon in support of the charge;

6.4.6.4 the range of sanctions applicable under the Anti-Corruption Code or the Code of Conduct if the charge is admitted or upheld;

6.4.6.5 (where applicable) the matters relating to Provisional Suspension specified at Article 6.5; and

6.4.6.6 that if the Participant wishes to exercise his/her right to a hearing (whether to contest liability or sanction or both), other than in circumstances where the offence has been admitted or otherwise the evidence is beyond dispute, he/she must submit a written request for a hearing that explains how the Participant responds to the charge(s) and (in summary form) the basis for such response. To be effective, the request must be received by ESIC or its officers as soon as possible, but in any event within seven (7) days of the Participant’s receipt of the Notice of Charge.

6.4.7 In circumstances where the offence(s) have been admitted or the evidence is such that, in the opinion of ESIC, is beyond dispute, ESIC may elect to issue a final charge without the need to first provide a Notice of Charge as prescribed ordinarily under the Code.

The Integrity Commissioner may, at their discretion, use the below or otherwise determine or establish another sanction methodology, in determining the appropriate sanction.

7.1 Where a Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner or Disciplinary Panel determines that an offence under the Code of Conduct has been committed, he/she/it will be required to impose an appropriate sanction on the Participant.

7.2 In order to determine the sanction that is to be imposed in each case, the Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner or Disciplinary Panel must first consider whether the Participant has previously been found guilty of an offence under the Code of Conduct within a period of twenty four months prior to the date on which the alleged offence took place.

7.3 Once the Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner or Disciplinary Panel has established whether this is a repeat offence within the relevant twenty four month period, then they shall go on to take into account any other factors that they deem relevant and appropriate to the mitigation or aggravation of the nature of the Code of Conduct offence (including, without limitation, the nature and frequency of any previous offences under the Code of Conduct) before determining, in accordance with the following table, what the appropriate sanction(s) should be:

7.4 Suspension Points shall accrue to a Participant over a rolling 24 month period. When a Participant accumulates 8 (or more) Suspension Points, he or she shall automatically be suspended until after the conclusion of next Member Event he/she has entered or is due to be involved in an another capacity of a similar or reasonably comparable status to that which he/she usually plays in the opinion of the Integrity Commissioner (or, if no Events of a comparable status have been entered, could reasonably have been expected to enter in the discretion of the Integrity Commissioner).

7.5 For the avoidance of any doubt:

7.5.1 the Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner or Disciplinary Panel will have jurisdiction to adjust, reverse or amend the results of any Match or Event where appropriate in their absolute discretion;

7.5.2 where a Participant is found guilty of committing two separate Code of Conduct offences that do not relate to the same incident or set of circumstances and is sanctioned separately for each offence, then any sanctions should run cumulatively (and not concurrently);

7.5.3 where a Participant is found guilty of committing two Code of Conduct offences in relation to the same incident or set of circumstances and is sanctioned separately, then any sanctions imposed should run concurrently (and not cumulatively);

7.5.4 nothing in this Code of Conduct shall prohibit plea bargaining in relation to any alleged offence committed under this Code of Conduct;

7.5.5 where the Match Referee, Integrity Commissioner or Disciplinary Panel finds a Participant not guilty of the offence, then it remains open to him/her, at his/her discretion, to find the Participant guilty of an offence of a lower level than that with which he/she has been charged. For example where a Participant has been charged with (but been found not guilty of) a Level 2 Offence, the Match Referee may, instead, find the Participant guilty of the Level 1 Offence and impose an appropriate sanction; and

7.5.6 where a fine is imposed against a Player, then such fine shall be deducted directly from the prize money due to the Player and redistributed amongst all other players/teams eligible for prize money in the relevant Match/Event. In all other cases and in respect of costs awards and cases involving Participants other than Players, fines and costs awards must be paid to ESIC by the Participant within ten (10) working days of the finding of guilt. However, ESIC will consider any request from any Participant to make the payment of such fines and/or costs over a prolonged period of time on the grounds of financial hardship. Should any fine and/or costs award (or agreed part-payment or instalment thereof) not be paid within such deadline or by the time of the next agreed payment date, the Participant may not play or otherwise participate or be involved in any capacity in any Match or Event until such payment has been satisfied in full. Any money paid to ESIC pursuant to this clause will be donated to a registered charity at the discretion of the ESIC Executive Board.

7.6 Once any period of suspension has expired, the Participant will automatically become re-eligible to participate in Matches provided that he/she has paid, in full, all amounts forfeited under the Code of Conduct, including any fines, compensatory awards or award of costs that may have been imposed against him/her.

The procedure for appeals against decisions made under this Code is set out in the Disciplinary Procedure which details that appeals shall be made to IGET in accordance with IGET’s Rules, specifically section 44.2(a) of the IGET Rules. It should be noted that there is no appeal from decisions in relation to a first Level 1 Offence.

9.1 Any sanctions, hearing results or other final adjudications under the Code of Conduct shall be recognised and respected by all Members of ESIC, Participants and any person with personal responsibility under this Code automatically upon receipt of notice of the same,

without the need for any further formality. Each of ESIC and its Members shall take all steps legally available to it to enforce and give effect to such decisions.

10.1 The Code of Conduct may be amended from time to time by the Executive Board of ESIC, with such amendments coming into effect on the date specified by ESIC.

10.2 The Code of Conduct shall come into full force and effect on 1st May 2016 (the ‘Effective Date’). It shall not apply retrospectively to matters pending before the Effective Date.

10.3 If any Article or provision of this Code of Conduct is held invalid, unenforceable or illegal for any reason, the Code of Conduct shall remain otherwise in full force apart from such Article or provision which shall be deemed deleted insofar as it is invalid, unenforceable or illegal.

10.4 The Code of Conduct is governed by and shall be construed in accordance with English law.